home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sun001.spd.dsccc.com!spd!jmccarty
- From: jmccarty@spd.dsccc.com (Mike McCarty)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Stupid Question: What does "foo" stand for?
- Date: 15 Feb 1996 19:44:34 GMT
- Organization: DSC Communications Corporation, Plano, Texas USA
- Message-ID: <4g02f2$i0f@sun001.spd.dsccc.com>
- References: <DLA6o4.8s0@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> <4fktpb$rj@news1.sunbelt.net> <sconi-1102962136100001@ip-29.newportnet.net> <31225756.66806152@netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: aplo139.spd.dsccc.com
-
- In article <31225756.66806152@netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov>,
- Kevin Quitt <kdq@emoryi.jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
- )On Sun, 11 Feb 1996 21:36:09 -0800, sconi@superstore.com (Chris Tiee "Chochoni
- )Boboni") wrote:
- )
- )>Wait a minute. There's another dumb question I have to ask. Why? Why do
- )>they love to use "foo" so much?
- )
- )Do you mean the mudders or the programmers. While I can't answer for the
- )warped mudders, I can answer for programmers. Foo is the canonical variable
- )name - that which is used instead of a meaningful name, perhaps because there
- )is no meaningful name. It's similar to using 'i' as a loop-counter variable
- )(i.e., laziness and/or no particular good name to use otherwise).
- )--
- )#include <standard.disclaimer> http://emoryi.jpl.nasa.gov/
- ) _
- )Kevin D Quitt USA 91351-4454 96.37% of all statistics are made up
-
-
- I must have missed the beginning of this thread, but I'll make a stab at
- it. Because they can't use the real word, but like the idea of using it,
- so they used it. Then it caught on, and others copied it w/o knowing
- what it means.
-
- I don't use it. I dislike it.
-
- Mike
- ----
- char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
-
- I don't speak for DSC. <- They make me say that.
-